Re: Homo Erectus Traits in Hss

On Aug 18, 11:53 pm, "J.LyonLayden" <JosephLay...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Why would it be potentially racists? A thick skull is an advantage not
a disadvantage. And what's with the PC idea that racism stops with
Hss? I don't take it as a given that Hss is superior to neanderthal or
erectus. If aborigines retain erectus genes and the rest of us do not,
perhaps that even makes the aborigines superior.


Of course I shouldn't say superior. I don't believe one species or
race can be superior to another at one given time in history or
prehistory, because they've both had the same amount of time to
evolve.

In other words, when Hss lived along side Erectus soloensis, neither
were more or less evolved than the other, because they had both
evolved for the same amount of time.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Homo Erectus Traits in Hss
    ... I don't take it as a given that Hss is superior to neanderthal or ... perhaps that even makes the aborigines superior. ... evolve. ... At some point, in some way, we were more fit to a changing environment than they. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Garmin City Navigator 7, North America: I like it!
    ... MG 4 was much superior to the current CS6 and 7 in many ways. ... continued to evolve, it would have been far superior. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.geo.satellite-nav)