Re: Homo Erectus Traits in Hss

On Aug 18, 10:29 pm, Tom McDonald <kilt...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 18, 8:30 pm, "J.LyonLayden" <JosephLay...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Aug 18, 8:21 pm, Tom McDonald <kilt...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Aug 18, 3:23 pm, "J.LyonLayden" <JosephLay...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

No. You would start with a review of the available physical
anthropology wrt Aboriginal cranial anatomy. For the hearsay story you
report to have a scientific basis, you would have to show that Aussie
Aboriginals' occipital and/or parietal bones (depending on what
exactly is meant by 'the back of the head') is significantly more
robust than those of the human group to which you belong.

I didn't say it had a scientific basis. Just reporting what I know on
a casual forum.
I guess I was hoping that someone would cough up a link to aborigine
skull comparisons.
There have to be some, as much hub-bub as was generated in the early
years of Darwinism about their possible prehistoric lineage.

.

Loading