Re: Models of migration to the New World
- From: Daryl Krupa <icycalmca@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:10:47 -0700
On Aug 29, 9:15 pm, "Tedd Jacobs" <tjac...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
there is no verification for a peopling of the new world 50-55<snip>
kya. all there are is models which say "it could have happened as long ago
as this..." or "its not possible because of this...". you are looking for
verification, you wont find any.
The National Geographic maps are bogus.
The text accompanying the maps around 50,000 years ago explicitly
states that there is no evidence of the presence of human beings in
the Americas at that time.
There are other problems with the maps, especially the extent of
glacial ice in nearly all the maps.
One stupid mapping mistake that is glaringly obvious is the
depiction of migration routes into the Americas overlaid on an ice
mass that is continuous between the Atlantic and Pacific coasts, i.e.
the migration route includes thousands of kilometres of unbroken ice
surface.
This has all been a complete waste of time.
Feh.
- A grumpy one
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Models of migration to the New World
- From: David
- Re: Models of migration to the New World
- Prev by Date: Re: Confirmed: Pre-flood giants of Bolivia wrote proto Sumerian.
- Next by Date: Re: Confirmed: Pre-flood giants of Bolivia wrote proto Sumerian.
- Previous by thread: Re: Confirmed: Pre-flood giants of Bolivia wrote proto Sumerian.
- Next by thread: Re: Models of migration to the New World
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|