Re: Bristol centaur stone
- From: tigger <aj-smith@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 02:12:11 -0700
Hi Ken - I read Watkins' book many years ago, and it is still on my
shelves. I am not a ley-line addict, but the idea he presented seems
to me to be a scientific one in the sense that it can be examined in
relation to physical evidence and either found to be supported by it,
or disproved. One hundred years have gone by during which sufficient
evidence, and its interpretation, should have been found one way or
another. This is the sense in which my enquiry is serious. So far,
the replies I have received have not met this criterion of
seriousness. I am asking for comment based on scientific scrutiny in
relation to empirical evidence, not mere opinion, prejudice, received
authority, or spurious metaphor.
Tigger (becoming impatient)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bristol centaur stone
- From: Kendall K . Down
- Re: Bristol centaur stone
- From: sprocket
- Re: Bristol centaur stone
- References:
- Bristol centaur stone
- From: tigger
- Re: Bristol centaur stone
- From: Digger
- Re: Bristol centaur stone
- From: tigger
- Re: Bristol centaur stone
- From: Kendall K . Down
- Bristol centaur stone
- Prev by Date: Re: The Great Deluge
- Next by Date: Ancient Pig DNA Study Sheds New Light On Colonization Of Europe By Early Farmers
- Previous by thread: Re: Bristol centaur stone
- Next by thread: Re: Bristol centaur stone
- Index(es):