Re: Bad Archaeology

On Sep 3, 11:33 pm, "Tedd Jacobs" <t...jac...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"J.LyonLayden" wrote...
Could you please address this quote from Uriel's Machine for me?

sure, it's not archaeology, and no experts in the fields of archaeology or
astonomy have adopted it. quite simply: science is not expressed by a
formula in which devels and angels constitute variables.

Then how does archeology explain it?
A time-released DNA capsule?
Or do you guys just ignore it?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Wild kettle and oxen
    ... The groups name is archaeology, ... science, the scientific analyses are of no discussion value anyway. ... before and some here have religious faith, ... need to be solely about god, they can be about tribal myths of origin ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: You are cataloguers,not astronomers
    ... An astronomer may not understand why his information fails to ... > produce excitement because he does not fully grasp that archaeology is ... > science) foster a lack of attention on the part of the Egyptology ... constant along the height of the pyramid. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Charter sci.archaeology
    ... Archaeology and history ask about human life ... science while firmly rooted in the humanities. ... of human life in former times? ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: The Neolithic/Mesolithic Boundary(4) Climatic Instability Gives way to Stability
    ... archaeology being discussed on this group. ... with lithics presented by yours truely and you don't seem to give a damn. ... next about the same abuse, complaints, grandstanding, bad science, bad ... The demon you know is alot better ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Fossil fish "first on land."
    ... Yep, paleontology ... Nope, not archaeology ... how dare he discuss something concerning science in a group ... I can offer a parting word of advice. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
Quantcast