Re: Archaeology and speculation
- From: David <pchristainsen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 03:46:44 -0700
On Sep 7, 4:29 am, "Peter Alaca" <p.al...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
David <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
Why Graham Han*** turned into a punching bag among sci.archers is
a mystery to me.
Yeah, that is one of your big problems
On the contrary Graham Han*** stirred the pot even though he made
many mistakes, being trained in sociology instead of archaeology.
One of the reasons you and Tom McDonald underestimated what I had
to say about Mehrgarh is that you both underestimate Han***.
Han*** knows something about Indian history, sacred scripture etc.
because he spent his formative years in India and his wife is Tamil.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Archaeology and speculation
- From: John
- Re: Archaeology and speculation
- From: Kendall K . Down
- Re: Archaeology and speculation
- From: Digger
- Re: Archaeology and speculation
- References:
- Re: Archaeology and speculation
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Archaeology and speculation
- Prev by Date: Re: U.S. archeologists find possible mastodon carving on Lake Michigan rock
- Next by Date: Re: Who were the Olmecs
- Previous by thread: Re: Archaeology and speculation
- Next by thread: Re: Archaeology and speculation
- Index(es):