Re: Bad Archaeology
- From: "J.LyonLayden" <JosephLayden@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:27:24 -0000
On Sep 7, 4:43 am, Eric Stevens <eric.stev...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 04:47:14 -0000, "J.LyonLayden"
<JosephLay...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 6, 8:35 pm, Eric Stevens <eric.stev...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 18:34:45 -0500, Tom McDonald
Even with agriculture you are limited by area of agricultural land
within the range set by the perishability of your food and the means
to transport it.
Large towns and cities are absolutely dependent on transport.
Eric Stevens
I'm thinking I have to mostly stick to fishing villages with 50-60
people for the sedentary clans.
I'm wondering if I can have them w/ fishing poles. We know they fished
but we don't know how.
Oldest stone hooks are 20,000...but was bone used before that date?
How about nets and spears?
We know maori used nets thousands of feet long. Why should not our
primitive ancestors?
Excellent thanks.
But what about bone hooks? Is it plausible?
For the first sentence of a story something like:
"Half a million years ago, by a river near a bay, the sidhe sat with
his back to a luan tree, casting his fishing line into the water."
It kind of gives a rustic, hobbit-like mood.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bad Archaeology
- From: Melodious Thunk
- Re: Bad Archaeology
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: Bad Archaeology
- References:
- Re: Bad Archaeology
- From: Michael Kuettner
- Re: Bad Archaeology
- From: J.LyonLayden
- Re: Bad Archaeology
- From: Michael Kuettner
- Re: Bad Archaeology
- From: J.LyonLayden
- Re: Bad Archaeology
- From: Michael Kuettner
- Re: Bad Archaeology
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: Bad Archaeology
- From: J.LyonLayden
- Re: Bad Archaeology
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: Bad Archaeology
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Bad Archaeology
- From: J.LyonLayden
- Re: Bad Archaeology
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Bad Archaeology
- Prev by Date: Re: Homo erectus, city dweller and sailor
- Next by Date: Re: Homo erectus, city dweller and sailor
- Previous by thread: Re: Bad Archaeology
- Next by thread: Re: Bad Archaeology
- Index(es):