Re: Let's reappraise Graham Han*** on ancient Indian history

On Sep 7, 12:53 pm, "Digger" <p.du...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"David" <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:1189173561.261828.188220@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I am convinced that Han*** is right that the Vedas contain clues to
Indian history from
remotest antiquity.

I don't doubt that for one second. This is part of Han***'s "charm". He can
take credible threads of information then twist them into the most
incredible yarn. He is one of the greatest exponents of making 2 + 2 = 547.

Let's get specific.

Han*** says, based on Manu (Hinduism) -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manu_%28Hinduism%29

-

that an oceanic flood devestated the Indian coastline but that vedic
sages found refuge in the Himalayas.

His creativity is to push the date of it into remotest antiquity -
9000 BC or earlier at the end of the Ice Age.
See Underworld for his explanation

---

Feel free to criticize Han***'s idea. OTOH, you may agree with me
that
it is possible.

.

Quantcast