Re: Archaeology and speculation
- From: David <pchristainsen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 08:06:54 -0700
On Sep 7, 12:23 pm, Kendall K. Down <webmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In message <1189162004.237468.79...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
David <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Han*** knows something about Indian history, sacred scripture etc.
because he spent his formative years in India and his wife is Tamil.
And that qualifies him to write about Egypt?
Ken Down
--
================ ARCHAEOLOGICAL DIGGINGS ===============
| Australia's premier archaeological magazine |
| http://www.diggingsonline.com |
========================================================
For the sake of argument, let's agree that Egypt might have been one
of
Han***'s mistakes. I invite you to get specific about it.
However, my context is Han***, India, Mehrgarh, marine archaeology,
Vedas, his 2002 book "Underworld...".
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Archaeology and speculation
- From: Kendall K . Down
- Re: Archaeology and speculation
- References:
- Re: Archaeology and speculation
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Archaeology and speculation
- From: David
- Re: Archaeology and speculation
- From: Kendall K . Down
- Re: Archaeology and speculation
- Prev by Date: Re: Homo erectus, city dweller and sailor
- Next by Date: Solid Ground
- Previous by thread: Re: Archaeology and speculation
- Next by thread: Re: Archaeology and speculation
- Index(es):