Re: Archaeology and speculation

In message <1189264014.217157.98890@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
David <pchristainsen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

For the sake of argument, let's agree that Egypt might have been one
of Han***'s mistakes. I invite you to get specific about it.

Just read the blurb on the cover of his books; that tells you all you need
to know.

However, my context is Han***, India, Mehrgarh, marine archaeology,
Vedas, his 2002 book "Underworld...".

It is hard to believe that someone can write garbage on one subject and then
write similar stuff on another subject and be worth reading.

Ken Down

--
================ ARCHAEOLOGICAL DIGGINGS ===============
| Australia's premier archaeological magazine |
| http://www.diggingsonline.com |
========================================================
.

Quantcast