Re: Archaeology and speculation

David <pchristainsen@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:

On Sep 9, 9:23 am, "Peter Alaca" <p.al...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
David <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
On Sep 8, 12:28 pm, Kendall K. Down <webmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In message <1189264014.217157.98...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
David <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

For the sake of argument, let's agree that Egypt might have been
one of Han***'s mistakes. I invite you to get specific about it.

Just read the blurb on the cover of his books; that tells you all
you need to know.

However, my context is Han***, India, Mehrgarh, marine
archaeology, Vedas, his 2002 book "Underworld...".

It is hard to believe that someone can write garbage on one subject
and then write similar stuff on another subject and be worth
reading.

IMHO Graham Han***'s 2002 book "Underworld..." on marine
archaeology is well worth a read because he shows he has paid his
dues.

Your HO is worthless.
Piss off, troll

--
p.a.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I resent your clutter. Eventually, other people on the NGs will tell
you to stop.

How many time people on this ng have asked /you/ to stop?

.

Quantcast