Re: Homo erectus, city dweller and sailor
- From: Tom McDonald <kiltmac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 17:21:06 -0500
veritas wrote:
<snip--see how easy?>
As the neurologist told me, "Just because you are 98.5% the same in
DNA structure does not prove you are kin to a particular species. It
proves that the tasks you perform require similar body parts.
Remember, a mouse has about 90% of the same DNA as you. Does that
make you part mouse? No." That is what he told me. Regards, Ken
He was wrong, or you didn't understand him. Was he a creationist or ID follower, by any chance? <shudder>
All life on Earth is related. Evolution displays that relationship in the twin nested hierarchies of life--DNA and morphology. Sort of the 'Tree of Life', but with clades instead of branches.
DNA charts that relationship. We are not mice; but we share a common ancestor with mice, albeit some time ago. We share a much more recent common ancestor with other great apes; and can be considered, as I consider us, the 'third chimpanzee'; since we share a more recent common ancestor with the other two chimp species than we do with gorillas; and a more common ancestor with gorillas than with Old Men of the Forest.
According to modern biological systematics, humans are members of each clade (think 'taxon', mostly) in our full Linnean designation:
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Primates
Family: Hominidae
Genus: Homo
Species: H. sapiens
Subspecies: H. s. sapiens
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human
(I would add "Life" above the Kingdom level, since we are also related to all life on earth:
* Life on Earth (Gaeabionta)
o Nanobes ?
o Acytota **?
o Cytota
+ Bacteria *
+ Neomura
# Archaea
# Eukaryota
* Bikonta
o Apusozoa
o Cabozoa
+ Rhizaria
+ Excavata
o Corticata
+ Archaeplastida
# Rhodophyta
# Glaucophyta
# Plantae
+ Chromalveolata
# Heterokontophyta
# Haptophyta
# Cryptophyta
# Alveolata
* Unikonta
o Amoebozoa
o Opisthokonta
+ Choanozoa
+ Fungi
+ Animalia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life
We are much more connected, in far more interesting ways, to everything else than you are perhaps aware, or willing to allow.
Me? I do so love being hooked in to everything. :-)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Homo erectus, city dweller and sailor
- From: veritas
- Re: Homo erectus, city dweller and sailor
- References:
- Homo erectus, city dweller and sailor
- From: Jack Linthicum
- Re: Homo erectus, city dweller and sailor
- From: Matt Giwer
- Re: Homo erectus, city dweller and sailor
- From: J.LyonLayden
- Re: Homo erectus, city dweller and sailor
- From: Matt Giwer
- Re: Homo erectus, city dweller and sailor
- From: J.LyonLayden
- Re: Homo erectus, city dweller and sailor
- From: veritas
- Re: Homo erectus, city dweller and sailor
- From: Matt Giwer
- Re: Homo erectus, city dweller and sailor
- From: veritas
- Re: Homo erectus, city dweller and sailor
- From: J.LyonLayden
- Re: Homo erectus, city dweller and sailor
- From: Doug Weller
- Re: Homo erectus, city dweller and sailor
- From: veritas
- Homo erectus, city dweller and sailor
- Prev by Date: Re: Homo erectus, city dweller and sailor
- Next by Date: Re: Homo erectus, city dweller and sailor
- Previous by thread: Re: Homo erectus, city dweller and sailor
- Next by thread: Re: Homo erectus, city dweller and sailor
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|