Re: Solid Ground
- From: grapheus <grapheus@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 02:41:19 -0700
On Sep 14, 11:19 am, hagen <dan5m...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What do you want me to do? Here I count every reliable stroke in the
clay 244 +61+60. And this is wrong, you say.
This is not "mathematically wrong". But it is "biaised" by your desire
to reach a given figure, and moreover without any signification !..
http://web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/husk.gif
When I demonstrate another choise by defining 70 stems, and as a
logical consequence receive 104 abbreviations 244 +104 +17, this is
wrong too
Same remark : it is not "mathematically wrong", but "biaised" by your
desire to reach a significant figure !..
http://web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/demo2.htm
The fact is, I did all my countings correct!
On a mathematical point of view, yes !.. But on the point of view of
"making meaningfull calculations", no !.. Your calculations are going
against the "common sense", and are adding pears and apples to reach a
given number, known in advance...
If this is not a
calendar, what is then a calendar?
An object where the hieroglyphs can be interpreted as having some
meaning !.. In your case, you are just dealing with them and with the
dividers as if they were just points and strokes ! (And your Figure is
clearly showing that !). But the hieroglyphs are NOT just that ! they
MUST have a meaning. But in whatever "Calendaric solution" (not only
yours, but others' too), no "reasonable meaning" can be given to them
in the case of the Phaistos Disk, contrary to the other known, similar
true calendars...
Regards
grapheus
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Solid Ground
- From: hagen
- Re: Solid Ground
- References:
- Solid Ground
- From: hagen
- Re: Solid Ground
- From: grapheus
- Re: Solid Ground
- From: hagen
- Re: Solid Ground
- From: Matt Giwer
- Re: Solid Ground
- From: hagen
- Re: Solid Ground
- From: grapheus
- Re: Solid Ground
- From: hagen
- Re: Solid Ground
- From: grapheus
- Re: Solid Ground
- From: hagen
- Re: Solid Ground
- From: grapheus
- Re: Solid Ground
- From: hagen
- Re: Solid Ground
- From: grapheus
- Re: Solid Ground
- From: hagen
- Re: Solid Ground
- From: grapheus
- Re: Solid Ground
- From: hagen
- Solid Ground
- Prev by Date: Re: Solid Ground
- Next by Date: Re: The difficulties of archaeology
- Previous by thread: Re: Solid Ground
- Next by thread: Re: Solid Ground
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|