Re: Solid Ground

On Sep 15, 4:04 pm, hagen <dan5m...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
.......
The problem when one tries to discuss with you is that you are
endlessly repeating your same "demonstration" and refuse to come back
to the basics and to answer the questions asked.
So, I repeat the main one : "What are you proposing as the MEANING of
the GLYPHS and other signs ?" .
With the "text solution", the answer is obvious : the glyphs
correspond to SYLLABLES, the separators are CUTTING the WORDS. the
"special separators" are MARKING the BEGINNING of the text, and the
"oblique strokes" marking the NAMES of INDIVIDUALS. With the Mayan
Calendar, the answer is also obvious : the GLYPHS are the NAMES of the
DAYS, or of the MONTHS, etc.
But WHAT about your calendaric solution ?

Regards
grapheus- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You mean I am kicking the ball out of the stadion?

Yes. This is exactly what you are doing by NOT ANSWERING the QUESTION
I asked.

That is because I find it ill-timed to discuss what comes next > to a
great discovery

But is not "what comes next", but the basic thing !..


(> No one should deny, that this is what drives researchers
(by the way I thanks professor Rosario Vieni! for having had the
courage to do so)
http://racines.traditions.free.fr/dis4ciel/index.htm

Strange that you are thanking Posario Vieni for advocating a DIFFERENT
THEORY from yours !..

I can't blame Grapheus, he is excussed under the circumstances, he is
doing correct, isn't he?;
but the bounch of editors and scholars, which I've consulted within
the last twenty-four years, about what to do in this case, ought to be
ashamed, they are though the ones, who promote sensational results
(flock-mentality hunting the individuals. Let it never be again).

Why are you complaining ? You have published a book. You and your
theory are now pretty known from your posts on the Net... Even in
foreign countries like France. Do you know that your ideas and your
name have been quoted in the French journal "Les Grands Secrets de
l'Archéologie" N° 5 of August 2007 ?.. But I've to add that the
author of this paper writes that the "Calendaric Solution" is wrong in
his opinion and prefers the "Proto-Ionian Solution"... Too bad for
you...

Regards
grapheus

.

Quantcast