Re: Trashing Jewish Holy Sites
- From: Kendall K. Down <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 06:17:43 GMT
In message <46ee1369$0$18925$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Matt Giwer <jull43@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In the area is likely correct but not ON TOP of the Rock. And that comes from
those six descriptions.
Ah, so now that you have been called on it, you are hastily qualifying your
idiotic statement.
Ken Down
--
================ ARCHAEOLOGICAL DIGGINGS ===============
| Australia's premier archaeological magazine |
| http://www.diggingsonline.com |
========================================================
.
- References:
- Trashing Jewish Holy Sites
- From: Peter Jason
- Re: Trashing Jewish Holy Sites
- From: Matt Giwer
- Re: Trashing Jewish Holy Sites
- From: Kendall K . Down
- Trashing Jewish Holy Sites
- Prev by Date: Re: Trashing Jewish Holy Sites
- Next by Date: Re: Bad Archaeology
- Previous by thread: Re: Trashing Jewish Holy Sites
- Next by thread: Re: Trashing Jewish Holy Sites
- Index(es):
Loading