Re: Let's push back the peopling of the New World to at least 50,000 BC



On Aug 28, 8:57 am, David <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 27, 2:05 pm, Jack Linthicum <jacklinthi...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

...
The "kelp highway hypothesis" first crystallized among an
interdisciplinary group working at the National Center for Ecological
Analysis and Synthesis. The study's other researchers include: Michael
Graham of Moss Landing Marine Laboratories; Bruce Bourque of Bates
College; Debbie Corbett of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in
Anchorage, Alaska; James Estes of the U.S. Geological Survey and the
University of California-Santa Cruz; and, Robert Steneck of the
University of Maine.

Thanks for giving detailed, additional information.

Moving on -

50,000 -55,000 BChttps://www3.nationalgeographic.com/genographic/atlas.html

The map traces migration routes into North and South America

The Genographic Project: Principal Scientific Investigatorshttp://press.nationalgeographic.com/pressroom/pressReleaseFiles/11133...

"North America
Principal Investigator: Theodore Schurr, Ph.D.
Institution: Laboratory of Molecular Anthropology
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA"

---

After checking into Dr. Schurr's credentials, I am confident that
scientific
verification of a very early date for the peopling of the New World is
there
for the taking off the Internet.

If any sci.archer would step in with pointers to this verification, it
would
be extremely helpful.

From all indications of human tools we have, 16,000 years ago is to
long ago in North America. The animals that were here to use us for
food, we could not have fought at that time. However, South America,
if we could have gotten down the coastlines without to much trouble,
we could have started civilization down there. North America at that
time had populations of the flat faced Giant Cave Bear as well as the
Saber-Tooth at that time and we did not have the weapons or the
numbers to kill them all off as we finally did from 12,000 B.C. to
11,000 B.C. when the last of both were found. Regards, Ken
--
"Truth does not give a damn what we conceive. We survive or perish
according to our ability to discern the truth correctly and act upon
it."- Ken www.veritasnovel.com

.



Relevant Pages

  • Lets push back the peopling of the New World to at least 50,000 BC
    ... The map traces migration routes into North and South America ... The Genographic Project: Principal Scientific Investigators ... "North America ... If any sci.archer would step in with pointers to this verification, ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Models of migration to the New World
    ... The map traces migration routes into North and South America ... The Genographic Project: Principal Scientific Investigators ... "North America ... The point of my post is to lead to verification of the 50-55,000 BC ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Models of migration to the New World
    ... The map traces migration routes into North and South America ... The Genographic Project: Principal Scientific Investigators ... "North America ... Principal Investigator: Theodore Schurr, Ph.D. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Who was worse?
    ... South America when they came through there looking for gold in the ... we know the British had many battles with the ... North American Indians when they were colonizing North America, ... It is true that in North America, ...
    (soc.history.war.misc)