Re: Were seafarers living in British Columbia 16,000 years ago?
- From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 16:04:31 -0700
On Aug 24, 5:00 pm, David <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Times Colonisthttp://www.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/news/story.html?id=348058...
To me the evidence is clear. Pushing on, I would be interested in
what other NGers
have to say about SPECULATION on New World colonization several tens
of millennia earlier.
Regards,
David Christainsen
Newton, Mass USA
When a university tells you, that footprints of modern man in lava,
are 1.3 million years old.
You should accept what they tell you.
The people who found them, from Britain, are desperately clinging to
the notion those prints are only 40,000 years old.
They seem to forget that if you ignore the data and evidence that they
are 1.3 million years old, you will have to throw out science as we
know it.
Because their findings are based on the common dating methods, which
are in wide use and accepted by the geological and archaeological
communities.
Are you people on drugs?
I was wondering if you were all on drugs because hey, hello there,
13,000 16,000 not even close.
There is a city 2,100 feet underwater off Cuba.
There are 1.3 million year old footprints in lava, in Mexico.
That reality. No matter what you choose to believe as faith in your
own beliefs about Siberia or people from Asia the facts are that Asia
was populated by migration from South America period.
Millions of years ago.
http://tinyurl.com/2wtj2a
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Prev by Date: Re: New paradigm re. America's Viking Age history
- Next by Date: Re: Were seafarers living in British Columbia 16,000 years ago?
- Previous by thread: Cyrenaica archaeological project, Libya
- Next by thread: Re: Were seafarers living in British Columbia 16,000 years ago?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
