Re: Taking scholarly work seriously...




Tom McDonald wrote:

My argument here is that the DSS are, at this point, far more
historical and religious than it is archaeological.

That doesn't mean that there are no conceivable archaeological
implications to the 14C dating of the DSS. But, for our purposed on
this ng, getting into the dating of the DSS would not lead to any
serious archaeological discussions.

Ah. I see. I agree 100%.

Or do you think it would? All I can see it doing is serving to give
Carl another thing to use to avoid archaeology.

I set my killfile so I don't even know whether he has
posted or not. Does anyone here imagine that paying
furter attention to him will result in anything other
than more repititions of his robotic responses?



.

Relevant Pages
Quantcast