Re: Nefertiti's lovely elongated head

On Oct 8, 5:54 am, rick_so...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
You see no one would have thought that sitting up there was exactly
one of these spheres, except maybe a guy like this...http://s2.supload.com/free/NearIcaPeru-9-5-2007.jpg/view/

Found at Ica, by the location of the Ica stones, by the Nazca lines
etc.

And so the reason you don't see a lot of talk about it, is because
civilization here and in Mesopotamia where everyone is directed to
look, is not that old. Of course people of the earth did not build the
moon.

But we have every reason to believe that civilization came from there.
The only people who would think otherwise, either think that it sprang
from the desert, or it came from Mars.

And well how it sprang from the desert well they say it was a gradual
evolution of ideas out of necessity and fire and tool use opposing
thumbs, next came primitive culture drawing writing and then presto,
Greek Philosophy.

People like to think that Egypt is somehow the center of the universe.
And they like the idea that it came from Mars.
Well, the only thing I know, is that it didn't. It is not that old,
there is no evidence it came from Mars, and the only evidence is it
came from Robert, inside the moon.
And there are Ica stones which I have found recently which confirm
what I have being saying about that for 20 years.

But then you can always say they are fake.

And so I have shown how Mesopotamia and Egypt have their roots in
Peru, and shown the stellae which say so, and which talk about cocaine
and show the story line of the water bringer Gods, and the pre-Olmec
race, and the pyramids, where in this palette, there is a pyramid
depicted in the top left corner, 500 years older than any pyramid in
the Middle East.http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a3/NarmerPalette-ROM-...

There was proto-sumerian writing found in Peru.
That means that before Sumer was established, people were trading with
Peru, or, people had migrated to the region.http://www.altarcheologie.nl/index.html?connections/characters_01.htm

So then if we examine the moon and Aitken Basin, there is something
strange about Aitken Basin.
It is the largest crater in the solar system. And the shallowest for
its size. So shallow you can hardly even see it.
So how does a huge almost circular crater, end up being as shallow as
that?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Moon_PIA00304.jpg
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/publications/slidesets/clem2nd/slide_26.html

You know you can always just write it all off as being nothing at all.
People have done that for a long time. If the facts don't support
their assertions, they just hide the facts, and fudge the data. When
you find artifacts that don't fit the paradigm, then just say they are
fake, or out of place artifacts. When people claim they saw something
in the sky! Swamp gas of Venus.
Its all a coincidence, its all a conspiracy, its all a hoax, its all a
mass hallucination, its all in your imagination, etc.
So I guess people have to make up their own mind what the facts are
based on little bits of information they can glean between the lines
because when there actually are facts, they don't fit the paradigm,
and so they are classified. Right? Suddenly they become top secret and
a threat to national security.





.