Re: The Dawn of Art

---

• From: "Peter Alaca" <p.alaca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 10:26:18 +0200

---

David <pchristainsen@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:

Rudgley's approach is reasonable and thought provoking IMHO.

Tell us why
.

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: The Dawn of Art
    • From: David
  • Re: The Dawn of Art
    • From: Doug Weller

• References:
  • The Dawn of Art
    • From: David
  • Re: The Dawn of Art
    • From: Digger
  • Re: The Dawn of Art
    • From: Doug Weller
  • Re: The Dawn of Art
    • From: David
  • Re: The Dawn of Art
    • From: Hal
  • Re: The Dawn of Art
    • From: Doug Weller
  • Re: The Dawn of Art
    • From: David
  • Re: The Dawn of Art
    • From: Tom McDonald
  • Re: The Dawn of Art
    • From: Doug Weller
  • Re: The Dawn of Art
    • From: Tom McDonald
  • Re: The Dawn of Art
    • From: David
  • Re: The Dawn of Art
    • From: Tom McDonald
  • Re: The Dawn of Art
    • From: David

• Prev by Date: Re: Update on the Newport Tower
• Next by Date: Re: What linked the Bell Beakers?
• Previous by thread: Re: The Dawn of Art
• Next by thread: Re: The Dawn of Art
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

• Windows
• Science
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

sci.tech-archive.net  > Archive  > sci.archaeology  > 2007-10