Re: A question about archaeolgical sterility of sites with a religious connection.
- From: "Jean" <jean.lenior@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:39:21 +0100
Eric Stevens a écrit dans le message
<8fdmk3lntpgrp3i0bei18pvl0ciah4c20a@xxxxxxx>...
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 10:26:52 +0100, "Peter Alaca"
<p.alaca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
BTW, Mark W Holley knws a lot about theApparently he once was but switched to marine archaeology as he found
Crannoghs of Islay, but I found no indication
he ever was involved archaeological work on
sacred sites or standing stones.
it more interesting.
Eric Stevens
Don't know the nature of the Towers mortar but here is a tidbit to look at.
For the dating of lime mortar to have any meaning at all the lime binding
material must be completely brunt
(unlikely in homemade or crude mortars) and completely free of limestone or
carbonate aggregates (highly unlikely)
http://www.carbon14.pl/geo/pdf/geo_24/Geo24_15.pdf
http://mysite.du.edu/~jcalvert/phys/carbon.htm
JL
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- A question about archaeolgical sterility of sites with a religious connection.
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: A question about archaeolgical sterility of sites with a religious connection.
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: A question about archaeolgical sterility of sites with a religious connection.
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: A question about archaeolgical sterility of sites with a religious connection.
- From: Eric Stevens
- A question about archaeolgical sterility of sites with a religious connection.
- Prev by Date: Re: GENETICISTS FIND STRONG SUPPORT FOR ONE GROUP PEOPLING THE AMERICAS
- Next by Date: Re: GENETICISTS FIND STRONG SUPPORT FOR ONE GROUP PEOPLING THE AMERICAS
- Previous by thread: Re: A question about archaeolgical sterility of sites with a religious connection.
- Next by thread: Re: A question about archaeolgical sterility of sites with a religious connection.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|