Re: The mysterious origins of the Polynesians

On Nov 27, 4:01 pm, "benli...@xxxxxxxxxx" <benli...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 28, 1:51 am, peterpanthe...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

So far none of you have anything of substance that contests what I
have said.
The few supercilious remarks by the above four members of this blog do
not warrant further comment.
I was hoping that such a Science/Archaeology blog such as this would
attract people who had something positive to contribute to the
discussion.

Peterpanther

You admitted towards the end of our last discussion that you didn't
really want people to examine or criticise your views, but simply to
do more research and find data to support them. Why should anyone
waste any more time with you?

Ross Clark

I agree with you and the tenor of your question.

BTW, did you notice the YAWNING lack of interest of
sci.archers in the Bradshaws?

David Christainsen
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The mysterious origins of the Polynesians
    ... The few supercilious remarks by the above four members of this blog do ... not warrant further comment. ... I was hoping that such a Science/Archaeology blog such as this would ... Bradshaw rock artwww.bradshaw.dk/pages/bibliography/adoranten.pdf ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: The mysterious origins of the Polynesians
    ... The few supercilious remarks by the above four members of this blog do ... not warrant further comment. ... I was hoping that such a Science/Archaeology blog such as this would ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: The mysterious origins of the Polynesians
    ... The few supercilious remarks by the above four members of this blog do ... not warrant further comment. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: The mysterious origins of the Polynesians
    ... The few supercilious remarks by the above four members of this blog do ... not warrant further comment. ...
    (sci.archaeology)