Re: The mysterious origins of the Polynesians

On Nov 27, 10:00 pm, "benli...@xxxxxxxxxx" <benli...@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Nov 28, 3:41 pm, David <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Nov 27, 9:23 pm, "benli...@xxxxxxxxxx" <benli...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Nov 28, 1:58 pm, David <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Nov 27, 4:01 pm, "benli...@xxxxxxxxxx" <benli...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Nov 28, 1:51 am, peterpanthe...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

So far none of you have anything of substance that contests what I
have said.
The few supercilious remarks by the above four members of this blog do
not warrant further comment.
I was hoping that such a Science/Archaeology blog such as this would
attract people who had something positive to contribute to the
discussion.

Peterpanther

You admitted towards the end of our last discussion that you didn't
really want people to examine or criticise your views, but simply to
do more research and find data to support them. Why should anyone
waste any more time with you?

Ross Clark

I agree with you and the tenor of your question.

BTW, did you notice the YAWNING lack of interest of
sci.archers in the Bradshaws?

David Christainsen

Not in any way that seemed surprising.

I, on the other hand, was shocked and deeply offended
by their bad attitude because they started flinging wild accusations.

They may be fascinating, but their age and their meaning are largely
unknowable (like most rock art).
They seem to be surrounded by a bit of a cult.
You had nothing new to say about them.
Why did you expect interest?

Ross Clark- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Wrong.

"Wrong" about what exactly?

I had something NEW to say about them INDIRECTLY
via the quality of my references.

I gave 2 A + references.

I said nothing about the quantity or quality of your references.

True.

You've forgotten

No I haven't.

but I

forgive you.

I don't need your forgiveness.

After this, read between the lines. I was NOT patronizing you.
I take you at your word that you did not forget.

You haven't explained what you would expect people to discuss.

Ross Clark
...

If sci.archers don't pick anything of their own choice from the
2 A+ references by the time I get back from my Virgin Islands
vacation about 10 days from now, I'll take a crack at it myself.

David Christainsen
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The mysterious origins of the Polynesians
    ... back in 1891) long before I ever learned about newsgroups. ... Bradshaw foundation, your *quality references,* has been around quite ... *therapy* and, odd as it seems, has great value to him. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: The mysterious origins of the Polynesians
    ... back in 1891) long before I ever learned about newsgroups. ... Bradshaw foundation, your *quality references,* has been around quite ... *therapy* and, odd as it seems, has great value to him. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • 7 questions about LaTeX usage
    ... lower quality than the JPEG itself. ... Q-4) How do I solve this footnote problem? ... the end of my document, in a separate page, with a Heading, but can't ... puts a "References" heading automatically, ...
    (comp.text.tex)
  • Re: Another oracle resource goes down the drain
    ... Was it necessary for the personal attack on Steve Adams? ... I remember reading your name on Tom Kyte's blog about oracle-l and the ... quality of the people that post there. ...
    (comp.databases.oracle.server)
  • Re: In the News: Author of Peer-Reviewed Creationist Paper Seeks
    ... Last week saw one blog explode with comments about a paper espousing ... creationism that had appeared in Proteomics, a peer-reviewed biology ... Jin Han, of Inje University, in South Korea. ... references. ...
    (talk.origins)
Loading