Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- From: "Peter Alaca" <p.alaca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:24:39 +0100
"Jack Linthicum" <jacklinthicum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
"Peter Alaca" wrote:"Digger" <p.du...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:"JerryT" wrote >>
v>>> very approximate dating technique. Where else has it beenI remain extremely dusious that this can be anything but a
employed and by whom?
>http://www.americanscientist.org/template/AssetDetail/assetid/17236
The article in pdf format
http://www.phys.au.dk/ams/hale-jh-2003(jan17)datingancientmortar@.pdf
"CARTOON GOES HERE"
Anyone know what this cartoon is? The phrase is the last statement in
the paper and might give us clues as to the confidence of the authors.
Perhaps a Viking putting impurities in the mortar?
.
- References:
- Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- From: Digger
- Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- From: Digger
- Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- From: JerryT
- Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- From: Jack Linthicum
- Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- Prev by Date: Re: Ancient Greenland mystery has a simple answer, it seems:Thingsgot colder and they left.
- Next by Date: Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- Previous by thread: Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- Next by thread: Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- Index(es):