Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower

"Eric Stevens" <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:hnj9l3h1f2kc0tem57kcc7n0jckle20ga0@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 18:10:12 -0500, "Steve Marcus"
<smarcus_spamout_@xxxxxxx> wrote:

[...]

An important diference between us is that you have taken a position on
the age of the tower and are trying to defend it. I have taken no
position and want to investigate further. I don't know why that should
worry you so much.


And that is exactly the problem.
The Newport Tower /is/ dated
but you refuse to accept that.
You call that taking no position?
I call it ignoring the evidence.

[...]

--
p.a.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
    ... the age of the tower and are trying to defend it. ... I call it ignoring the evidence. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Latest on Newport Tower dig
    ... Eric Stevens wrote: ... you post the picture so we can see it. ... seen this photograph your talking about. ... Tower' NEARA Journal Vol XXX, 3&4, wrote: ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: AV after the last changes...
    ... If they do defend IB GY, ... There is 0% that we will win a game where 10+ horde defenders and 0 alliance ... S> Much more tower retaking in last few days... ...
    (alt.games.warcraft)
  • Re: S1 gear
    ... defend a tower there's a very good chance you are doing it on your ... Balgair (70 Human Rogue) ...
    (alt.games.warcraft)
  • Re: 2.3 Alterac Valley is not broken!!!
    ... Take TP tower (defend) ... or 6 people fail to kill Galv ... Horde retake E/W FWT ...
    (alt.games.warcraft)
Loading