Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower

From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:53:30 +1300

On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 09:10:50 +0100, "Peter Alaca"
<p.alaca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Eric Stevens" <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:hnj9l3h1f2kc0tem57kcc7n0jckle20ga0@xxxxxxxxxx

On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 18:10:12 -0500, "Steve Marcus"
<smarcus_spamout_@xxxxxxx> wrote:

[...]

An important diference between us is that you have taken a position
on
the age of the tower and are trying to defend it. I have taken no
position and want to investigate further. I don't know why that
should
worry you so much.

And that is exactly the problem.
The Newport Tower /is/ dated
but you refuse to accept that.
You call that taking no position?
I call it ignoring the evidence.

That last sentence is strange when you consider that you are objecting
to me carefully examing another part of the evidence.

Eric Stevens
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
  - From: Steve Marcus

References:
- Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
  - From: Steve Marcus
- Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
  - From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
  - From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
  - From: Steve Marcus
- Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
  - From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
  - From: Steve Marcus
- Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
  - From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
  - From: Steve Marcus
- Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
  - From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
  - From: Steve Marcus
- Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
  - From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
  - From: Peter Alaca

Prev by Date: Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
Next by Date: Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
Previous by thread: Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
Next by thread: Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: The Newport Tower - some reflections, and a question
... here about the recent work on the Newport Tower. ... What, if any, hard archaeological or other evidence (evidence, not ... say twenty miles) of the Newport Tower before 1800? ... Journal/Paper there do exist a drawing from where they had to stay ...
(sci.archaeology)
The Newport Tower - some reflections, and a question
... here about the recent work on the Newport Tower. ... What, if any, hard archaeological or other evidence (evidence, not ... British settlers, were active - at any time - at, or near to (within ... say twenty miles) of the Newport Tower before 1800? ...
(sci.archaeology)
Re: NYPD knows who youve been talking to. And where youve been.. [Telecom]
... evidence was the identification of the convicted person by ... It has since emerged that the base station antenna pattern of the GSM ... And the 'best tower' wins. ... as part of the evidence that resulted in a conviction, ...
(comp.dcom.telecom)
Re: Groups 2nd dig at Touro Park supports astronomical claim - or so the reporter said.
... century date for the construction of the tower. ... The lack of evidence of anything other than aspects of the tower ... depends on how you define archaeology. ...
(sci.archaeology)
Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
... the age of the tower and are trying to defend it. ... I call it ignoring the evidence. ... But my point is that at present, radiocarbon dating of mortar from a site ... investigations) at the Newport Tower site dates earlier than the 17th ...
(sci.archaeology)