Re: Science vs Scholarship and the Newport Tower

Eric Stevens wrote:
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 17:37:17 GMT, "David B." <tronospamchos@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

The significant aspect of what I wrote was not so much the presence of 17th century material, but that such presence was combined with a complete absence of earlier material- which I'm sure the Chronognostic folks would have trumpeted to the world if they'd found a single scrap. Eric was writing about "archaeological findings" (as opposed to "finds") by Godfrey- who again placed more significance on absence than presence.

I would be interested to know your source for this. Here is the final
paragraph of chapter IIX of Godfrey's thesis (page 137):

"In spite of the great numbers of fragments of various kinds found,
it cannot be said that the collection shed more than the faintest
light on the problem of the Tower. Fascinating as it is to browse
around the many boxes containing tantalizing fragments of our
ancestors culture, the pieces do not tell when, why, and by whom
the Tower was built. Oae could speculate endlessly about the
portion of the neck of a Spanish oil Jar: where did it come from,
how did it get here, but its position indicated that it arrived
long after the Tower's builder departed. China doll fragments
suggest a world of pathetic young misses in crinolines, weeping
over their broken treasures, but do not suggest who moved the
stones, mixed the mortar, and designed this strange structure. For
that solution, we must look further."

I am not aware that Godfrey was able to progress past this point.

You're not understanding the passage- what Godfrey is saying there is simply that the evidence he found gave no indication as to who built the tower. However, the datable items he found were all 17th century or later, so elsewhere he tentatively assigned a 17th century date to the building- in the absence of earlier finds.

And the documentary record IS clearly related to the NT, unless the 1677 stone mill within that plot of land is not the 1777 old stone mill.

We can't presently answer that implied question.

We can answer it with an extremely high degree of probability, given that the sole building within the upper 8-acre part of the same plot of land was referred to as the "old stone wind mill" in Edward Pelham's will (1741).

David B.


PS- going off at a bit of a tangent. Is the stone used in the mill local? A lot of flattish blocks of stone would probably be brought into Newport as ship ballast.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Science vs Scholarship and the Newport Tower
    ... by Godfrey- who again placed more significance on absence than presence. ... light on the problem of the Tower. ... stone mill within that plot of land is not the 1777 old stone mill. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Science vs Scholarship and the Newport Tower
    ... the absence of pre-17th century artifacts in conjunction with a building does make a pre-17th century construction date significantly unlikely. ... History is a science, inasmuch as theories are developed on the basis of evidence gathered, and then tested by gathering more evidence. ... For example, when we speak of the theory that the present Newport Tower is the stone mill mentioned in Governor Arnold's will, we are using the word "theory" in the scientific sense: ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Science vs Scholarship and the Newport Tower
    ... "In spite of the great numbers of fragments of various kinds found, ... stone mill within that plot of land is not the 1777 old stone mill. ... Newport as ship ballast. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Kidney stone?
    ... clarify the presence of a stone? ... Many stones, especially uric acid stones, are missed by plain film. ... I will eat Grandfather for dinner." ...
    (sci.med)
  • Re: Cranham Stone Quarries
    ... In article, Aidan Karley writes ... You'll note that the description of the properties of the stone is decidedly similar to the description of Portland Stone and Bath Stone. ... I'm not sure if it's the absence of groundwater, increased levels of oxygen or what. ...
    (uk.rec.caving)