Re: 1Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 11:10:06 +1300
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 21:43:02 GMT, "David B." <tronospamchos@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Eric Stevens wrote:To the contrary. I know that in many cases they are not.
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 21:45:29 +0100, "Peter Alaca"
<p.alaca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Eric Stevens" <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uvvll3l5r50jloohiqseobh9rfr8g9eevb@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 10:31:02 GMT, "David B."
<tronospamchos@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
When I see a plan with scale bars, I believe I amJust as a matter of interest, is your screen flat panel or CRT? Is it
entitled to assume that that plan is drawn to scale. If it was drawn
to
scale on a computer, then that scale should be preserved in relative
terms, when measured in pixels, in versions of the drawing saved in
formats such as jpg.
connected to your graphics card by an analog or digital connection?
Do you have any experience with graphical software
like Photoshop?
My computers are full of it and have been for years.
Right now I'm running Photo Shop, Photo Paint and Nikon Capture
Editer. I've also run other stuff in the past. I'm also running Corel
Draw and Visual Cadd, both of which use vector graphics. There is
nothing like a vector-graphic circle to show up errors in the display
of aspect ratios.
So you should know very well that the dimensions of a drawn object *in
pixels* are independent of the screen display.
The only circumstances in which the pixels are likely to be
independent of the display is when one is using a plasma/LCD display
using a digital connection to the computer. But even then some
graphics cards can introduce errors, especially when you are not
running the screen at its native resolution.
Eric Stevens
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 1Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- From: Daryl Krupa
- Re: 1Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- From: David B.
- Re: 1Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- References:
- Re: 1Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- From: David B.
- Re: 1Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: 1Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- From: David B.
- Re: 1Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: 1Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- From: David B.
- Re: 1Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: 1Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- From: David B.
- Re: 1Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: 1Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: 1Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: 1Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- From: David B.
- Re: 1Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- Prev by Date: Re: Science vs Scholarship and the Newport Tower
- Next by Date: Re: Time marches on... let's review the Bradshaws
- Previous by thread: Re: 1Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- Next by thread: Re: 1Re: Problems with the radio carbon dating of the Newport Tower
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|