Re: NEHEMIAH IDENTIFIED X 4 AT PERSEPOLIS


"Peter Alaca" <p.alaca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:478d10ee$0$90862$dbd43001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Lars Wilson" <siaxares@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:QKKdnVM_FeDokhDanZ2dnUVZ_viunZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Peter Alaca" <p.alaca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:478ca539$0$59774$dbd4d001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Lars Wilson wrote, On 15/01/2008 11:41:

Who he hell do you think you are that you think
you must tell /us/ what archaeology is.
With all due respect, Peter, whether you like it or not, part of archaeology
is affected by the current timeline. I don't think you realize that.

Solomon is only a myth, for instance, when dated to 970-930 BCE.
But a time of grand buildings and "full statehood" matching the grandeur
of Solomon actually existed in Israel, confirmed by archaeologists at
Gezer, Hazor and Megiddoe in the "early 9th century" BCE.

The ONLY THING making Solomon a myth, therefore, is the
chronology. Insisting on dating Solomon to 970-930 BCE, or
Shishak to 925 BCE. Once archaeologists note this clear discrepancy,
they have a choice to downdate Solomon to the early 9th century
in line with archaeology, OR if they think the chronology is correct
and irrefutable, look at revisionism by the Bible writers who would
have taken the Omri period grandeur and pushed it back 60 years
to the time of Solomon where they THINK they are seeing a
discrepancy. But this is no longer an archaeological argument but
a chronology argument.

What my research has discovered is that Xenophon added 58 years
of fake history to the Greek Period. The reduction of the Greek
Period affects the reduction of the Persian Period. When we began
to look closely at the Persian Period we discovered that Xerxes and
Artaxerxes were the same king, a scam pulled off masterfully by
Themistocles when he fled to Persia and discovered Xerxes was
also going by the throne name of Artaxerxes. We actually have
extant records that clearly state "Artaxerxes who was also known
as Xerxes."

But also among the bas-reliefs at Persepolis, is the very apparent
Nehemiah who was already the chief cupbearer (Prime Minister)
of Persia, standing right behind Xerxes during the Darius-Xerxes
co-rulership, a co-rulership acknowledged but not applied by
archaeologists.

If in fact, Xerxes and Artaxerxes were the same king, however,
then the buildings finished by Artaxerxes would have only been
a few years under construction maybe only 5-7. When the
fake chronology is introduced, then the buildings have to actually be
UNDER CONTRUCTION for up to 57 years!!! We have
proof Persepolis was began in the 4th year of Darius.

So this IS ARCHAEOLOGY! I need an honest archaeologist,
hopefully awake at the time, to revisit Persepolis and determine how
long those buildings would have been under construction. Now a
palace was built by Darius forXerxes on Babylon, the seat of the
co-ruler, in just two years. We have a record of that. Darius did
finish his palace that he started in his 4th year, thus likely his
sixth year. He didn't finish the other buildings, one of which was
finished by "Artaxerxes." My evidence shows this was just a
formal name change and not two different kings who were building
this building over the next 50 years.

But an ARCHAEOLOGIST would be able to determine how long
these buildings would have taken to build. As little as 7 years or
more reasonably under contruction for 50+ years.

Plus, WHY WASN'T THIS FIGURED OUT BEFORE by
ARCHAEOLOGISTS.

In the meantime, you have Artaxerxes buried between Darius I and
Darius II. An ARCHAEOLOGIST should be able to tell us
based upon sculpture comparison that Xerxes' new tomb was
created many years after the original three at Naqshi-Rustam.

Why is Artaxerxes buried in Xerxes' tomb?

Hello? It doesn't take a genius to figure out that Xerxes WAS
Artaxerxes and he was buried there because he died next.

I can go on. The VAT4956 was a text created during the Seleucid Period
to hide the original chronology in a safe text. It proves 511 BCE
was the original year 37 of Nebuchadnezzar.

Now, IF THAT IS CORRECT do you know how DUMB that makes
archaeologists look? No though, not DUMB, but more likely
DISHONEST. Paid off by by money and politics maybe?

THIS IS THE NEW REALITY. We don't need "archaeologists"
to adjust the secular timeline anymore, save for thanking them for
finding the RC14 materials to date Shishak's invasion correctly
in 871 BCE.

Archaelogists have to be called onto the carpet for bias and
betraying their own standards and for using outdated and
incompetent popular chronologies why playing fast and loose
with reliable history.

They need to WAKE UP, GET REAL, and realize their
assessments based upon the curent timeline are no more
relevant than how accurate those timelines are they are comparing.

Using the current Assyrian timeline is their Achilles heel, it's their
weakeast link in the chain. And now that chain is broken.

An YOU, want to hide your head in the sand and tell ME to get lost?

Oh sure.

Do yourself a favor and don't read any more of my posts and you
should remain happily uninformed. "Ignorance is bliss..." it would seem,
even among the educated.

The Titanic has struck the ice berg! It just hasn't sank yet. But sinking
it will. That is a mathematical certainty.

Lar Wilson


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: 1947 Prophetic Dating of Exodus archaeologicall confirmed
    ... Xerxes fakes his death and claimed he was Artaxerxes!! ... All the Persian kings had double names and the double name ... modern historians and archaeologists! ... you'll just admit to the facts. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Mexico opens windows on buried treasures
    ... Two daylong guided tours of the sites, known as "archaeological windows," are scheduled for April, and will take visitors to about 20 sites currently open to the public, as well as 20 more "windows" hidden beneath stairwells, floors and patios of buildings normally not open to the public. ... The origins of the archaeological window technique go back to the early 1900s, when archaeologists began burrowing down to Aztec temples without disturbing the Baroque structures above them. ...
    (sci.archaeology.mesoamerican)
  • Are archaeologists incompetent? Xerxes is Artaxerxes!
    ... Xerxes and Artaxerxes, ... palace of Darius that IDENTIFIED the image as that of "Xerxes". ... since the history basically indicates that Xerxes ... So archaeologists are not really "incompetent" or stupid, ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: NEHEMIAH IDENTIFIED X 4 AT PERSEPOLIS
    ... Piss off, this is sci.archaeology ... ARCHAEOLOGISTS should have determined long ago that ... the buildings at Persepolis only should have taken about 7 years to build ...
    (sci.archaeology)