Re: Artaxerxes is buried between Darius I and II proving he's Xerxes!


"Matt Giwer" <jull43@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:479c4298$0$24111$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Lars Wilson wrote:

As you have been told by many people many times just what your errors are
and you continue to repeat the same nonsense it is only needful to
continue to remind you everyone knows you are a stupid retard.

I very well may be a stupid retard, but it won't change the facts.
Artaxerxes is
buried in the tomb that should have been for "Xerxes". The tombs prove
that "Artaxerxes" succeeded Darius.

Continue to ignore the facts. But as I said, once a critical review of the
Xenophonic revsisions is established, and Aristotle and Socrates are proven
to have known each other and been lovers, then the timeline will fall. The
only extrapolation here is to see WHAT IF. That is, the impact of
reducing the timeline by 54-60 years prior to the NB Period? As we
have noted, Shishak's invasion will match the RC14 dating.

Calling me a "stupid idiot" is just a flight technique since you have no
critical rebuttal. It's actually a compliement to me that my argument is
sound and you deep down agree with me

Lars Wilson
http://www.geocities.com/siaxares/709guide.html




.