Re: Archaeology and Bible timeline harmonized!


"Peter Alaca." <p.alaca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:479ee84b$0$90862$dbd43001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Lars Wilson wrote, On 29/01/2008 09:18:

You still pollute this group with your ***.

It is not "pollution" it is rebuttal. If you were not so biased and
anti-Biblical, you'd just rebut what I say. But you CAN'T. So you just
complain. If you were really smart and believed I offered nothing, you'd
just IGNORE what I have to say. But the fact is, some people still believe
the Bible is reliable history and archaeologists have done a poor job of
misrepresenting what is actually in the Bible and then taken to Bible
bashing the straw men arguments they create, all the while not being as
critical of the pagan timeline, clearly revised during the Persian and Greek
Period.

So sorry, this board was already POLLUTED with inaccuracies. I'm here to
clean up the *** the so-called archaeologists have been dropping on
everybody through negligence and dishonest.

But Peter. If I have the truth, the goods, the reality. And you think I'm
the "pollution" -- then what does that say about YOU. You are now
witnessing the turn of the tables. Universities and their special interest
grants to promote their own agendas has worked for centuries. But now,
science is not their handy tool anymore. RC14 dating has become so specific
now it is showing up some of the pagan revisions as well!! They can't deal
with it. But if they don't soon, they will go from being just stubborn to
being stupid.

Case in point Israel Finkelstein. Though he likely is academically
responsible for thinking that he logically should look to Hazeal to date the
destruction of Rehov City IV in 835 BCE, that goes against the sciencific
dating of the narrow range between 874-867 BCE! But that decision is
entirely based upon his needing to use the FIXED dating of the Assyrian
Period, which is dated not by RC14 dating but by a historical match-up with
a single ecilpse mention. Problem is, it's not really absolute. You have
other choices!! So in the end, when it is clear that Xenophon added 56
years of fake Greek hsitory and the timeline falls, Shishak will get dated
to 871 BCE and Finkelstein's assessment that Hazeal destroyed City IV Rehov
will be a JOKE. As it is now. Finkelstein could have saved himself by
including the entire alternative Biblical timeline, especially since he
focuses on the Bible, David and Solomon anyway. A Biblical chronologist
could have given him the range of dates. Martin Anstey wrote "The Romance
of Biblical Chronology" in 1914 and claimed that 82 years of fake Persian
history existed per the Bible. Jews like Josephus and others have likewise
contradicted the pagan timeline. All of this is IGNORED. Kathleen Kenyon
placed the Israelites in the LBA Period destorying Jericho between 1350-1325
BCE. That means the Exodus must occur 1390-1365 BCE. That alone would mean
Solomon's rule would not begin prior to 914 BCE, which places him during the
time of the "earth 9th century" where the very buildings clearly built by
Solomon are being dated by archaeologist.

So it's just INCOMPETENCE on top of NEGLIGENCE on top of BIAS influencing
archaeology and turning them into a freelance Bible-bashing machine. But
that is changing now.

So Peter, this is about YOU. If you think you don't need to become aware of
the Greek Period revisions by Xenophon, specifically, and you close your
eyes to that, pretending, "I'm not interested in the least about that part
of the history", then you will maintain an erroneous timeline and all your
results will be incompetent, just as incompetent as the currently based
Assyrian timeline.

You KNOW LITTLE and insist on keeping it that way. "See no evil-hear no
evil" with your head in the sand is not going to get it, Peter. You're not
addressing any issues by calling me a pollutant. You're RUNNING from
reality, and from science and research that you can never outrun now. The
VAT4956 automatically redates year 37 of Nebuchadnezzar to 511 BCE. You
know NOTHING about this nor do you want to. So you remain stupid. That way
you can continue your current fantasy. But it will not last. There is too
much evidence now that makes the usual dismissal of calling me "stupid" not
good enough. You have to deal with why Artaxerxes is buried in Xerxes'
tomb!! Why the RC14 dating points to 871 BCE just as the Bible does, but
why archaeologists can't figure that out.

So YES, archaeologists need to get their sorry act together and so do you.
I'm just giving you a glimmer of your future here. The current timeline has
been shot in the heart by the VAT4956 and the RC14 dating from Rehov and it
is dead. It just hasn't fallen over yet.

Lars Wilson
http://www.geocities.com/siaxares/709guide.html


.