Re: Jericho's fallen walls: Harmonizing Archaeology and the Bible

On Feb 12, 4:53 am, Matt Giwer <jul...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
J.LyonLayden wrote:
On Feb 10, 1:24 pm, Doug Weller <dwel...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 09:01:55 -0800 (PST), in sci.archaeology, J.LyonLayden
wrote:
Who cares? Bible talks about Jericho as one of the earliest cities,
then we find that Jericho's origins stretch back to the VERY
beginnings of civilization, as per the Bible,
I have no idea why you are having this ridiculous argument with Matt the
Pratt, as both of you have unusual ideas about evidence and Matt,  but
where do you get this from the Bible?
Well...any city mentioned in the Torah would have to be from the
beginnings of civilization, according to the writers of the Bible,
because they believed that Adam was the first man and that Noah was
the only survivor. If the city mentioned were known to be only, say,
4000 years old...wouldn't that be more consistent with falsehood?

        However no educated person takes that crap seriously.

From what Doug said no one takes you seriously either.
Thanks Doug, point taken!



--
If torture works, McCain talked.
        -- The Iron Webmaster, 3941
 http://www.giwersworld.org/holo/nizgas3.htmla4- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Jerichos fallen walls: Harmonizing Archaeology and the Bible
    ... Bible talks about Jericho as one of the earliest cities, ... then we find that Jericho's origins stretch back to the VERY ... beginnings of civilization, as per the Bible, ... I have no idea why you are having this ridiculous argument with Matt the ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Jerichos fallen walls: Harmonizing Archaeology and the Bible
    ... then we find that Jericho's origins stretch back to the VERY ... I have no idea why you are having this ridiculous argument with Matt the ... beginnings of civilization, according to the writers of the Bible, ... 4000 years old...wouldn't that be more consistent with falsehood? ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Jerichos fallen walls: Harmonizing Archaeology and the Bible
    ... then we find that Jericho's origins stretch back to the VERY ... I have no idea why you are having this ridiculous argument with Matt the ... beginnings of civilization, according to the writers of the Bible, ... 4000 years old...wouldn't that be more consistent with falsehood? ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Jerichos fallen walls: Harmonizing Archaeology and the Bible
    ... then we find that Jericho's origins stretch back to the VERY ... I have no idea why you are having this ridiculous argument with Matt the ... beginnings of civilization, according to the writers of the Bible, ... Doug Weller -- ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Jerichos fallen walls: Harmonizing Archaeology and the Bible
    ... then we find that Jericho's origins stretch back to the VERY ... I have no idea why you are having this ridiculous argument with Matt the ... beginnings of civilization, according to the writers of the Bible, ... 4000 years old...wouldn't that be more consistent with falsehood? ...
    (sci.archaeology)
Quantcast