Re: Is Dr. Thiering's reconstruction convincing or a victim of scholarly oversight?

On Feb 22, 8:19 pm, LloydB <bogart.l...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 22, 4:21 pm, Tom McDonald <kilt...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On Feb 22, 2:18 pm, David <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

For an opinion similar to mine please see -

post #1- 02-20-2008
calvin20874http://community.beliefnet.com/forums/showthread.php?p=300253

Calvin does far better than you at bringing himself and his own ideas,
as well as a much wider range of scholars and scholarship, to the
discussion. If you had behaved more like him in these ngs, your
reception would have been different, and more than likely far better
for you and more productive for those of us who might have some
interest in that wider discussion.

Thanks, though, for showing us how it might have been. Fundamentalism
like yours is always, at base, boring and useless except to those who
entirely agree with you.

But Tom; what benefit could there possibly be in endlessly
trolling those who entirely agree with him?

Silly me. What was I thinking?
.