Re: London previously said it played no role...

On 2008-02-22, Doug Weller <dweller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:05:10 +0000, in sci.archaeology, Whiskers wrote:
On 2008-02-22, Garry Denke <GarryDenke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 22, 1:10 pm, Whiskers <catwhee...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2008-02-22, Garry Denke <GarryDe...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 22, 11:46 am, Whiskers <catwhee...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2008-02-22, Garry Denke <GarryDe...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 22, 9:18 am, Peter Alaca <p.al...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Garry Denke wrote: on, 22/02/2008 16:08:

[...]

The official British record of George III's reign is summarised here if
anyone's interested in mere facts
<http://www.royal.gov.uk/output/Page111.asp>.

I can't remember if it was a Royalty King George I, II,
III, IV, V, VI, or some other name and number like that. It doesn't
matter much I guess, because he's Dead Royalty now,

also mentally ill and German. So?

Who are we talking about now? George III or Garry Denke?

[...]

Ask someone else. I'm mentally ill, but neither dead nor German, so I
claim a conflict of interest. Or something.

--
-- ^^^^^^^^^^
-- Whiskers
-- ~~~~~~~~~~
.