Re: Out of Africa, Not Once But Twice

On Mar 19, 12:43 pm, Doug Weller <dwel...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

The physical traits that have led this person to reach his conclusions
don't require your comprehension, thank goodness.

Ross doesn't deserve this sort of treatment from you, Jack.
I'm a bit surprised at your response.
Doug
--
Doug Weller --
A Director and Moderator of The Hall of Ma'athttp://www.hallofmaat.com
Doug's Archaeology Site:http://www.ramtops.co.uk
Amun - co-owner/co-moderatorhttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/Amun/

I don't agree. If you are posting in Sci.Archaeology I presume you
know about how people today conjecture about people from the past, by
observing as many way examples as possible. I don't know where and how
each person or generation existed between 40,000 ya and today, but I
can accept someone doing the comparison, without needing them to
demonstrate every possibility that might differ.

I won't even get into the part Maori micro biologist who found that
Maori women are from Taiwan and Maori men are from Melanesia. Highly
simplified, but basically the Melanesian men seemed to be the better
genetic catch and squeezed out whatever characteristics the original
male group migrating had.

http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/s823810.htm

http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/ancient/AncientRepublish_817069.htm
.