Re: WIKIPEDIA and "Proto-Ionians"

On Apr 14, 6:28 pm, Peter Alaca <p.al...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Cory Albrecht wrote: on, 14/04/2008 18:00:
grapheus wrote, on 2008-04-14 07:52:
Up to know, there was an article on "Proto-Ionians" in WIKIPEDIA, what

And that article is still there. You'll note that contrary to your
implied criticisms the article wasn't arbitrarily deleted. It was marked
for discussion about deletion

seems a normal thing when one remarks that typing "Proto-Ionians" on
Google or Yahoo, there are c. 1,000 references.

Actually, Google only gives 676 reerences, rather less than 1000,

Go to the last page and you will see that it only are
92 references. The rest is "very similar to the 92
already displayed"
But searching GoogleGroups gives 1070 hits. I suppose
all Grapheus

And did you made the same search for the WIKI-articles LAUNCHED by
Henrik ?... Do it !.. and you will get numbers about ten times
smaller...
But Henrik is a "Wiki-administrator", right ?... And so works
WIKIPEDIA : AS A SECTARIAN GROUP.
And this becomes more and more obvious every day !..

grapheus


  and of

the first 30 in that list:
   - 1 is an article by Faucounau
   - 5 are copies Wikipedia articles at other sites
   - 18 are threads where you have mention Faucounau's theory
   - 1 is somebody mentioning "Proto-Ionians" with no connection to
     you (I'm being nice an assuming that you don't nymshift)
   - 1 is a books.google.com result where I can't find the phrase
   - 1 is a domaintools.com advert link on an unrelated page
   - 2 are seemingly outdated links not posessing the phrase
   - 1 article on a Greek yahoo list, and I don't read Greek
[...]

--
p.a.

.

Relevant Pages