Re: It's not true that love is blind
- From: Matt Giwer <jull43@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:56:45 -0400
David wrote:
On Apr 20, 7:29�pm, Matt Giwer <jul...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:...
You remain an idiot.
...
Matt's world is very limited. Did you know that Peter Alaca
continues to respond to me? There are several others. Look
it up.
No one is the least interested in talking about your obsession. You keep
asking and everyone tells you they are not interested. You keep trying to
start a discussion everyone has told you they have no interest in. You
continue your obsession and the same thing happens every time.
EVERYONE tells you they are not interested in your delusional fixation yet
you continue. No one gives a *** about you or Thiering. EVERYONE considers
you an idiot.
No matter what you wish, no matter what you would like no one gives a ***
about your, your interests or Thiering. No one cares about you David, not
even Thiering.
There is no known connection between the Essenes and Qumran, the Essenes and
the DSS and none between the Qumran and the DSS.
You remain an idiot.
David, you are the one who accused someone else of being obsessive - and not
for the first time, either. So it seems only fair to point out that your
various obsessions have so far ended your marriage, got you a restraining
order and had you thrown out of one of the most tolerant and long-suffering
churches around.
--
Holding Israel to western standards is antisemitic.
-- The Iron Webmaster, 3972
http://www.giwersworld.org/environment/aehb.phtml a2
.
- References:
- It's not true that love is blind
- From: David
- Re: It's not true that love is blind
- From: Matt Giwer
- Re: It's not true that love is blind
- From: David
- It's not true that love is blind
- Prev by Date: Re: It's not true that love is blind
- Next by Date: Re: It's not true that love is blind
- Previous by thread: Re: It's not true that love is blind
- Next by thread: Re: It's not true that love is blind
- Index(es):