Re: In the sci.arch Archives is it usual to get 237 Messages into a Thread?
- From: David <pchristainsen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:52:10 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 22, 7:36 pm, Peter Alaca <p.al...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Carl wrote: on, 23/04/2008 01:03:
There were only 12 authors in the "Getting serious
about archaeological sites starting with Mehrgarh"
Thread starting from Jul 11 2007.
No, not 12 but 7 authors, and not 237 but 39 messages,
starting not 11 but 14 July
A fine example of your research.
I ignore completely your erroneous information.
Instead, I choose to educate you on Gregory Possehl;
something you could have done on your own but never did.
Review by by D.P. Agrawal
http://www.infinityfoundation.com/mandala/t_rv/t_rv_agraw_indus_frameset.htm
...
David Christainsen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: In the sci.arch Archives is it usual to get 237 Messages into a Thread?
- Next by Date: Re: It's not true that love is blind
- Previous by thread: Re: In the sci.arch Archives is it usual to get 237 Messages into a Thread?
- Next by thread: Re: In the sci.arch Archives is it usual to get 237 Messages into a Thread?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
