Re: In the sci.arch Archives is it usual to get 237 Messages into a Thread?

On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:26:40 +0200, Peter Alaca
<p.alaca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Eric Stevens wrote: on, 23/04/2008 11:34:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 08:13:07 +0200, Peter Alaca
<p.alaca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

David wrote: on, 23/04/2008 01:52:
On Apr 22, 7:36 pm, Peter Alaca <p.al...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Carl wrote: on, 23/04/2008 01:03:
There were only 12 authors in the "Getting serious
about archaeological sites starting with Mehrgarh"
Thread starting from Jul 11 2007.


No, not 12 but 7 authors, and not 237 but 39 messages,
starting not 11 but 14 July
A fine example of your research.


I ignore completely your erroneous information.
Of course you do, because you can't prove me wrong.

According to Google at http://tinyurl.com/4s3jqw there are 237
messages and 12 authors.


But not with the title "Getting serious about
archaeological sites starting with Mehrgarh"
That 337 thread started on 12 july 2007 as
"Archaeological Evidence for Dating Kurukshetra
War by Dr. S R Rao", and the title changed many
times, mainly by Carl himself


I don't entirely trust Google groups but this is better than nothing.

Search GG with the title and you'll find 35 (or 34 or 36)
messages. Via sci.tech-archive.net I found 39.

I used advanced search on groups.



Eric Stevens
.

Relevant Pages
Loading