The Early Bronze Age of Jericho in relation to Egypt
- From: Peter Alaca <p.alaca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:30:06 +0200
Bruins, H.J. & J. van der Plicht (2001)
Radiocarbon Challenges Archaeo-Historical Time
Frameworks in the Near East: The Early Bronze
Age of Jericho in Relation to Egypt
RADIOCARBON 43(3):1321–1332
Download article
Centre for Isotope Research RUG
http://tinyurl.com/5dr58m [PDF 12 pp, 195 kb]
"Our stratified radiocarbon dates from EB Jericho
(Trench III) on short-lived material are
significantly older than conventional archaeo-
historical time frameworks.
The calibrated 14C date of Stage XV Phase Ii-Iii
(Early to Middle EB-I Kenyon) is 100–450 years
older. Stage XVI Phase Ixi-Ixii (Early EB-II
Kenyon) is 200–500 years older. Stage XVI Phase
Ixii-Ixiii (destructive end EB-II) is 200–300
years older. Stage XVII Phase Ixviii a – Ixix a
(Early EB-III) is 100–300 years older than
conventional archaeo-historical time estimates.
As the beginning of the Chalcolithic in the Near
East has “become” a 1000 years older, from about
4000 in the 1960s to about 5000 BC in current
perception based on 14C dating, it should not be
surprising that the Early Bronze Age and related
Egyptian Dynasties also yield 14C dates that are
older by a few hundred years than current
archaeo-historical time frameworks.
Egyptian chronology should not be regarded as
ultimately fixed. Egyptologists in the first
half of the 20th century gave much older dates
for the earlier Dynasties. The new 14C evidence
is overwhelmingly in favor of an older Early
Bronze Age and older dates for Dynasties 1–6."
--
p.a.
.
- Prev by Date: Will Peter Alaca and Christopher Ingham find the cause of their ignorance?
- Next by Date: Re: Egyptian monuments, Pyramids packed with fossil shells
- Previous by thread: Will Peter Alaca and Christopher Ingham find the cause of their ignorance?
- Index(es):