Re: 77 mares
David wrote: on, 01/05/2008 16:00:
On May 1, 9:10 am, Peter Alaca <p.al...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And as I said earlier: You are obsessed with controversies.
Science is not about controversies, but about new insights
based on evidence.
...
May you find the cause of your ignorance on this matter.
d.c.
57 for controversial author:pchristainsen@xxxxxxxx
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: The Heresy of Scientists
... it's hypothesis built on the evidence. ... science, any more than it has to do with any other branch of science. ... Which controversies would do you think we should teach? ... As the overwhelmingly vast majority of scientists accept that evolution ...
(talk.origins) - Re: Speculative Design Hypothesis (with predictions)
... It is the definition of science as it ... ID offers no testable hypothesis and no supporting evidence. ... If it can be shown that evolution *cannot* ... Not to the IDers, perhaps, but they do matter to scientists. ...
(talk.origins) - Re: Challenge to evolutionists
... in science and rarely in religion. ... evidence may always change the explanation. ... No it could be included in science class. ... No, Calvin ball is an endeavour without rules, ...
(talk.origins) - Re: Bush Remarks On Intelligent Design Theory Fuel Debate
... > "I am certainly well aware of the advances of science. ... The question is - in the absence of evidence to the contrary, ... > design and creationism, ...
(soc.retirement) - Re: Comprehending Steven J.
... Your claim that Romans talks about modern evolution is one. ... The writers of the Bible had no idea about that evidence, and I don't expect them to have anticipated it. ... Ray, I've explained many times why natural evolution means nothing of the sort. ... The writers of the Bible knew nothing about science, the scientific method, or how life works. ...
(talk.origins) |
|
