Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory

On May 24, 4:37 pm, Peter Alaca <p.al...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jack Linthicum wrote, 24/05/2008 22:18:



On May 24, 4:02 pm, Peter Alaca <p.al...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
David wrote, 24/05/2008 20:10:

On May 24, 1:16 pm, Peter Alaca <p.al...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
David wrote, 24/05/2008 18:35:
On May 24, 11:44 am, Peter Alaca <p.al...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
David wrote, 24/05/2008 17:34:>http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-05/uol-nrf052308.php
"Research led by the University of Leeds has
discovered genetic evidence that overturns
existing theories about human migration into
Island Southeast Asia (covering the Philippines,
Indonesia and Malaysian Borneo) - taking the
timeline back by nearly 10,000 years."
d.c.
That is what Jack said.
I am happy you take your valuable time to track
evey move I make.
No need to track you down.
Unlike yoy I use a decent newsreader.
I have a Google Group account.
That's what I said.

Why did you repeat Jacks contribution?
Why do you ask such questions when you can
read between the lines? Clearly, I did not check
whether ANYBODY, let alone Jack, had got there
earlier with the same link. Why would you expect me
to do so?
You posted it in the same thread
in reply to Jack's post

As a possible explanation, I have noticed at least two situations this
past week where I have posted what I thought was an original thread
only to find it part of another thread which involved the same
original source. Either newsgroups or Google is getting tired of
multiple threads or the Internet is starting to think for itself.

Only if exactly the same title is used that is possible.
It happend to me once with a thread which was out of sight
for months.
But in any case The Carl did not read what was posted
only 17 hours earlier.

--
p.a.

That sounds right. I usually use the title from the source.
.

Relevant Pages