Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: Peter Alaca <p.alaca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 22:52:08 +0200
Jack Linthicum wrote, 24/05/2008 22:42:
On May 24, 4:37 pm, Peter Alaca <p.al...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Jack Linthicum wrote, 24/05/2008 22:18:
On May 24, 4:02 pm, Peter Alaca <p.al...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Only if exactly the same title is used that is possible.David wrote, 24/05/2008 20:10:As a possible explanation, I have noticed at least two situations thisOn May 24, 1:16 pm, Peter Alaca <p.al...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:That's what I said.David wrote, 24/05/2008 18:35:I have a Google Group account.On May 24, 11:44 am, Peter Alaca <p.al...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:No need to track you down.David wrote, 24/05/2008 17:34:>http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-05/uol-nrf052308.phpI am happy you take your valuable time to track"Research led by the University of Leeds hasThat is what Jack said.
discovered genetic evidence that overturns
existing theories about human migration into
Island Southeast Asia (covering the Philippines,
Indonesia and Malaysian Borneo) - taking the
timeline back by nearly 10,000 years."
d.c.
evey move I make.
Unlike yoy I use a decent newsreader.
You posted it in the same threadWhy did you repeat Jacks contribution?Why do you ask such questions when you can
read between the lines? Clearly, I did not check
whether ANYBODY, let alone Jack, had got there
earlier with the same link. Why would you expect me
to do so?
in reply to Jack's post
past week where I have posted what I thought was an original thread
only to find it part of another thread which involved the same
original source. Either newsgroups or Google is getting tired of
multiple threads or the Internet is starting to think for itself.
It happend to me once with a thread which was out of sight
for months.
But in any case The Carl did not read what was posted
only 17 hours earlier.
--
p.a.
That sounds right. I usually use the title from the source.
Like everyone else does. That's why such titles
(and the same content) are all over the net. :-)
--
p.a.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- References:
- New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: David
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: David
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: David
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: Jack Linthicum
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: Jack Linthicum
- New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- Prev by Date: Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- Next by Date: Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- Previous by thread: Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- Next by thread: Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|