Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: Peter Alaca <p.alaca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 23:01:08 +0200
George wrote, 24/05/2008 22:53:
On May 25, 8:18 am, Jack Linthicum <jacklinthi...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
As a possible explanation, I have noticed at least two situations this
past week where I have posted what I thought was an original thread
only to find it part of another thread which involved the same
original source. Either newsgroups or Google is getting tired of
multiple threads or the Internet is starting to think for itself.
The Net is its own bot. :-)
Some-one should work out just how many possible 'original threads'
there could be and when that number is reached.......
I think the number is almost endless.
Sometimes I deliberately use old titles, but
with a space added to fool the bot.
--
p.a.
.
- References:
- New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: David
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: David
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: David
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: Jack Linthicum
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: George
- New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- Prev by Date: Re: ZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz
- Next by Date: Re: ZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz
- Previous by thread: Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- Next by thread: Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- Index(es):