Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 13:54:07 +1200
On Sun, 25 May 2008 01:04:14 +0200, Peter Alaca
<p.alaca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Which is also why the two articles finished up in the same thread.
It's interesting to see that david's article has no entry for
'References' so it is not in the thread as the result of being the
answer to another article. I note also that both Jack Linthicum and
David use Google Groups so it is likely that Google Groups is
responsible for posting David's article as part of the thread started
by Jack.
Not in every reader it is part of the same thread.
I know its part of the same thread. My point is that the header shows
that its a completely new entry and not in response to another
article.
I also note that Jack's article has followed a different path
into my news server from that followed by David and this may explain
why David launched his without being aware that Jack had already
started the same thread.
Jack's post was there for over 17 hours.
That's a large delay but I have seen much bigger.
Eric Stevens
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- References:
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: David
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: Jack Linthicum
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: Jack Linthicum
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- Prev by Date: Re: Grasping at straws - simulation to suggest an Africa to South America crossing
- Next by Date: Re: Why are the sites in North and South America with claims for great age all on the East side?
- Previous by thread: Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- Next by thread: Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|