Re: New research forces U-turn in population migration theory

Eric Stevens wrote, 25/05/2008 03:54:
On Sun, 25 May 2008 01:04:14 +0200, Peter Alaca
<p.alaca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Which is also why the two articles finished up in the same thread.
It's interesting to see that david's article has no entry for
'References' so it is not in the thread as the result of being the
answer to another article. I note also that both Jack Linthicum and
David use Google Groups so it is likely that Google Groups is
responsible for posting David's article as part of the thread started
by Jack.
Not in every reader it is part of the same thread.

I know its part of the same thread.

Not in all newsreaders

> My point is that the header shows
that its a completely new entry and not in response to another
article.

So it is /not/ part of the same thread.



I also note that Jack's article has followed a different path
into my news server from that followed by David and this may explain
why David launched his without being aware that Jack had already
started the same thread.
Jack's post was there for over 17 hours.

That's a large delay but I have seen much bigger.
.

Relevant Pages