Re: The archaeological evidence, slender as it is, on King David and Goliath
- From: David <pchristainsen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 10:07:34 -0700 (PDT)
On May 27, 2:41 am, Kendall K. Down <webmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In message <e5dc9694-b743-4e01-bc5d-e905c33e7...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
David <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But, I ask how scientists know that it dates to
the 9th cent BC.
The style of the writing.
Ken Down
--
================ ARCHAEOLOGICAL DIGGINGS ===============
| Australia's premier archaeological magazine |
| http://www.diggingsonline.com ; |
========================================================
Thank-you. I agree with you because in my understanding there
is absolutely no scientific way to date stone.
d.c.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The archaeological evidence, slender as it is, on King David and Goliath
- From: Kendall K . Down
- Re: The archaeological evidence, slender as it is, on King David and Goliath
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Rethinking Beringia
- Next by Date: Re: Why are the sites in North and South America with claims for great age all on the East side?
- Previous by thread: Re: The archaeological evidence, slender as it is, on King David and Goliath
- Next by thread: Re: The archaeological evidence, slender as it is, on King David and Goliath
- Index(es):