Re: The archaeological evidence, slender as it is, on King David and Goliath
- From: David <pchristainsen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 10:33:44 -0700 (PDT)
On May 28, 2:47 am, Kendall K. Down <webmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
...
Despite the nonsense spouted by Matt the Pratt and his various hangers-on,
scholars have no problem with the idea that the Mesha of the inscription is
the Mesha referred to in the Bible and the revolt described on the stone is
the same as the revolt mentioned in the Bible.
...
Thanks for the clarification.
David Christainsen
.
- References:
- The archaeological evidence, slender as it is, on King David and Goliath
- From: David
- Re: The archaeological evidence, slender as it is, on King David and Goliath
- From: Kendall K . Down
- Re: The archaeological evidence, slender as it is, on King David and Goliath
- From: David
- Re: The archaeological evidence, slender as it is, on King David and Goliath
- From: Kendall K . Down
- The archaeological evidence, slender as it is, on King David and Goliath
- Prev by Date: NEW CARAL VIDEO
- Next by Date: New Statistical Method Reveals Surprises About Our Ancestry: Inferring Human Colonization History Using a Copying Model
- Previous by thread: Re: The archaeological evidence, slender as it is, on King David and Goliath
- Next by thread: academic translations
- Index(es):