Re: SKEPTICS WEIGH IN ON MEXICAN FOOTPRINTS

On Jun 6, 5:12 pm, michaelrugg...@xxxxxxx wrote:

"I am amazed that they are still flogging that dead horse," said Paul
Renne, of the University of California, Berkeley's Geochronology
Center. Renne led that team that initially dated the Valsequillo Basin
strata.

"We are about to publish even more data showing that the rocks are 1.3
million years old and that the 'footprints' are not," he said by e-
mail.
...

Paul Renne has not yet shown in the published literature
how old are the imprints.

To date scientifically the imprints convincingly is the basic
priority to settle the controversy.

David Christainsen
.