Re: Climate Change Not The Cause of Neanderthal Extinction
- From: Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 15:31:53 -0600
David wrote:
On Jan 2, 12:23 pm, Jack Linthicum <jacklinthi...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Jan 2, 10:13 am, David <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 2, 9:57 am, Jack Linthicum <jacklinthi...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:That's an evasion, not an answerOn Jan 2, 9:37 am, David <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:You overlooked what I already posted -On Dec 31 2008, 3:00 pm, Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2...@xxxxxxxxxxx>The sum total of your "climate science" is a snip from a site that had
wrote:
Jack Linthicum wrote:Relevance? What happened to to the Neanderthals?On Dec 31, 1:41 pm, David <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Don't you remember? It's "All David, All The Time". Only he isOn Dec 31, 1:03 pm, Jack Linthicum <jacklinthi...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Relevance? What happened to to the Neanderthals?
wrote:
On Dec 31, 12:26 pm, David <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Wrong. Further,On Dec 31, 11:59 am, Peter Alaca <p.al...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:This is "getting even"? More like an inability to stop talking,http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/29375.htmlDavid <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> 31/12/2008 17:42 wrote:> On Dec 30, 9:30 pm, Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:No, it shows that I don't get mad; I get even...No, it shows that you are only interested in yourself.David wrote:Yet, my post has the advantage of remindingAccuweatherJack posted the underlying study yesterday.
http://global-warming.accuweather.com/2008/12/climate_change_not_the_...
...
USENETters yet one more time that I am
a meteorologist <grin>.
David Christainsen
The Frigid Future Is Upon Ushttp://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message691463/pg1
"The UW-Madison researchers used their computer models to
compare a world impacted by this longer period of warming
with a theoretical world in which the climate remained
unaffected by human activities.
In the world absent man's influence, known glacial cycles --
predictable and regular periods that have to do with the orbit
of the Earth and radiation from the sun -- happened at regular
100,000-year intervals.
But Vavrus said when the researchers compared the changes
caused by humans with a world absent the impact of greenhouse
gases generated by man over the last 5,000 to 8,000 years, the
model told them that we should be entering an ice age.
'We should have been in a relatively cool climate state by now,'
Vavrus said.
When they removed the human-caused greenhouse gases, Vavrus
and Kutzbach said, three different models showed the same thing --
that more ice and snow should be forming in Canada, Siberia,
Greenland and the Rocky Mountains, all places where glaciers first
started forming during previous ice ages.
While this may seem a fortuitous finding -- especially as you survey
the small glacier in your driveway -- Vavrus cautioned that our
possibly having held off an ice age is not necessarily a good thing.
'It's important for people to realize,' Vavrus said, 'that this
research
suggests climate is very sensitive to greenhouse gases. And the
huge amounts we're emitting through modern activities are probably
going to have an even bigger impact.'
David Christainsen - Meteorologist
relevant....
What happened to my climate science?
David Christainsen
already been posted. BTW do you have a degree in meterology or
climatetology? School and year issued, please. Must establish your
bona fides.
...
The Frigid Future Is Upon Ushttp://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message691463/pg1
BTW have you cleaned up the foul language
you once used against me yet? I don't believe
Tom McDonald or Peter Alaca ever apologized
for their scandalous behaviour either.
I will not give my credentials to you in meteorology
unless you start behaving as a gentleman.
I've given my credentials in the relevant area every time I've been asked. It is easy to do.
For the record, I've sometimes been asked in very hostile ways, by very hostile people.
It's still easy to do. And it is a whole lot better than looking evasive; which is exactly how you look.
For starters, you can check my meteorology articles
on Google Groups going way back...
Those are only 'credentials' to the extent that they show you have posted some things about weather, and perhaps climate. They do not establish your academic qualifications (obtained either by a course of study in an institution, or by intensive independent study that is the equivalent of such a course of study).
Why not just say what qualifications you have, and how you came by them?
--
Tom "Go Pack" McDonald
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Climate Change Not The Cause of Neanderthal Extinction
- From: David
- Re: Climate Change Not The Cause of Neanderthal Extinction
- From: Jack Linthicum
- Re: Climate Change Not The Cause of Neanderthal Extinction
- From: David
- Re: Climate Change Not The Cause of Neanderthal Extinction
- From: Jack Linthicum
- Re: Climate Change Not The Cause of Neanderthal Extinction
- From: David
- Re: Climate Change Not The Cause of Neanderthal Extinction
- Prev by Date: Re: Jack, Peter, and Tom have to go to the back of the bus with the newagers
- Next by Date: Re: Jack, Peter, and Tom have to go to the back of the bus with the newagers
- Previous by thread: Re: Climate Change Not The Cause of Neanderthal Extinction
- Next by thread: Re: Climate Change Not The Cause of Neanderthal Extinction
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|